Filter by:

Reset Filter
Showing 1045 - 1056 of 1228
Case

Leary et al. v. Wells Fargo, Crocker National, Bank of America

Cornerstone Research evaluated plaintiffs’ claims of price fixing in the bank credit card industry.

Case

Mercedes-Benz Tying Cases

In two separate cases, independent warehouse part distributors Mozart and Metrix challenged Mercedes-Benz’s policy of requiring its dealers to use genuine, factory-authorized parts, claiming this policy was an illegal tying…

Case

Merger of Packard Bell and Subsidiaries of NEC and Groupe Bull

Packard Bell, the nation’s leading producer of personal computers at the time, announced a merger involving subsidiaries of NEC and Groupe Bull.

Case

Multiple Listing Service Tying Cases

In separate cases counsel representing either a local board of realtors or a multiple listing service (MLS) retained Cornerstone Research to analyze the plaintiffs’ claims that membership in a Board…

Case

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation

Cornerstone Research staff were retained by the defendants to coordinate the damage analyses in this closely watched proceeding.

Case

ParaData Computer Networks v. Telebit

The defense retained Dr. Michael Keeley in this breach of technology sharing matter.

Case

Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. et al. v. Connectix Corporation

Counsel for Connectix retained Dr. Michael Keeley to analyze the economic issues in this copyright infringement case.

Case

The Nature Company v. Natural Wonders

The Nature Company accused Natural Wonders of infringing its trade dress.

Case

CIM v. Wrigley

CIM sued Wrigley for an alleged breach of a joint software development agreement.

Case

Harris Corporation et al. v. Macronix International Co.

The plaintiff, Harris Corporation, had acquired a patent portfolio from General Electric and was seeking to realize value by widely licensing the patents.

Case

Intelectron, Inc. v. Heath Company, Inc.

Intelectron held patents on outdoor lighting fixtures with infrared motion detectors, and claimed that Heath, a much larger competitor, had infringed those patents, undercut the sales price, and earned unjust…

Case

Level One Communications, Inc. v. SEEQ Technology, Inc.

Level One sued SEEQ, claiming infringement of two of its patents, and SEEQ countersued, asserting that Level One had infringed one of its patents.

How can we help you?

If you are looking for a publication not on our website, contact us.