Estimating Damages in Litigation—Beyond Discounted Cash Flow
Ronnie Barnes spoke at a Cornerstone Research-sponsored interactive panel discussion in London.
SEC’s Renewed Focus On Non-GAAP Measures: 1 Year Later
In recent years, the use of non-GAAP financial measures has become more widespread.
Testifying Experts Draw Lessons from Recent Healthcare Mergers
This Cornerstone Research expert forum featured several healthcare merger experts.
Product Hopping
Pharmaceutical manufacturers have been accused of engaging in product hopping by introducing modified versions of branded drugs nearing patent expiry while simultaneously withdrawing the older drugs to hinder generic substitution.
Sampling in FCA Litigation
Clients draw on Cornerstone Research's statistical expertise to evaluate sampling analyses performed by opposing parties to prove liability and damages in False Claims Act litigation.
2017 Antitrust Writing Awards
John Asker of the University of California, Los Angeles was chosen as a winner in Concurrences Review’s annual selection of leading articles.
Approved Claims Rates in Securities Class Actions
When applied to aggregate damages estimates, approved claims rates from two recent securities case verdicts can provide an indication of potential damages exposure.
Advertising Targeting a Medical Services Provider
Counsel for a large medical services provider retained Cornerstone Research and an accounting professor to analyze the economic impact of the challenged advertising campaigns.
Alleged Unintended Acceleration and Brake Defects in Automobiles
Counsel for an automobile manufacturer retained Cornerstone Research and several experts to address plaintiffs’ claims in two national class actions.
Class Action Involving Food Product Labeling
A food manufacturer retained Cornerstone Research and a marketing professor to design and implement a nationwide survey to assess consumers’ purchasing behavior.
Energy Labeling of a Household Appliance
In a nationwide class action, the manufacturer’s counsel retained Cornerstone Research and an academic expert to respond to the damages analyses and a survey submitted by the plaintiffs’ experts.
False Claims Act Suit Involving Title IV Program
The plaintiffs argued that the defendants knowingly made false claims and statements in order to obtain Title IV program eligibility.