Parish Oil Co., Inc. v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
Plaintiffs claimed that they had been injured by Dillon’s bundling program and sought monetary damages to compensate them for alleged lost sales and lower profits.
Aguilar et al. v. Atlantic Richfield Corporation et al.
The defendants, major gasoline refiners in California, had been accused of fixing prices, restricting capacity, and limiting production when California converted to cleaner-burning California Air Resources Board (CARB) gasoline.
Cingular–AT&T Wireless Merger
Cornerstone Research was retained by counsel for BellSouth and SBC to support the parties during regulatory review by the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission.
Clorox v. Reckitt & Colman
When an antitrust counterclaim arose in a trademark infringement suit, defending counsel retained Cornerstone Research to assess the economics of the antitrust allegations.
Collins v. International Dairy Queen, Inc. and American Dairy Queen Corp.
Franchisees of International Dairy Queen (IDQ) alleged that IDQ illegally tied approved products to its franchise licenses.
Glaxo–Burroughs Wellcome Merger
Cornerstone Research assisted counsel during the Glaxo and Burroughs Wellcome merger, which created the largest pharmaceutical firm in the world.
In re Cigarette Antitrust Litigation
Class-action plaintiffs alleged that Philip Morris, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., and Liggett Group, Inc., had illegally conspired to fix the wholesale…
In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation
In a class-action antitrust suit, a class of purchasers alleged that the five major high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) producers had conspired to raise the price of HFCS over a…
In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
On behalf of several large corporate purchasers of vitamins, counsel retained Cornerstone Research to address both liability and damages issues.
Polyester Staple Antitrust Litigation
A class of direct purchasers accused the four major polyester staple fiber producers of conspiring to raise prices over several years.
S&M Farm Supply v. Pharmacia Company and Monsanto Company
A putative class of direct purchasers of glyphosate-based and paraquat-based herbicides alleged a price-fixing conspiracy between the defendant, Monsanto Company (a subsidiary of Pharmacia at the time of the lawsuit…
Thales Avionics, Inc. v. Matsushita Avionics Systems Corporation
Thales Avionics, Inc. alleged that Panasonic Avionics Corporation, formerly Matsushita Avionics Systems Corporation, had engaged in predatory pricing with respect to in-flight entertainment systems.
How can we help you?
If you are looking for additional case experience examples, contact us.